“要我”转换成“我要”
因为友人的邀请,我去了青岛跟一群年轻读者分享我的书《涟漪词》。我听到了他们的心声,如何认识自己,在大我及小我间如何找到平衡点,可以自信的展示自己,又不伤害别人。阻止他们勇敢的去做自己的因素通常是不想伤害身边关爱他们的人,不想让他们失望,就是父母,配偶,家人等。他们不约而同的觉得只有跟朋友在一起时他们觉得自在,最可以做自己。
我一直觉得这是非常可惜的,最爱我们的人应该是最期许我们快乐的做自己的人,但他们却是带给我们极大压力的人。因为他们对我们有太多的期许,把自己未圆的梦都寄托在孩子爱人身上,是有条件的爱。事实虽然如此,但积极的人生是必须自己去经营的,一次一次的为自己做决定,也愿意为自己的决定负责任。如果要掌握自己的人生,需要有勇气面对社会,家庭及他人对自己的期许,而不是把这些期许当作我们不追求自己生活的借口。有一位读者分享她第一次做了一个让家人失望的决定,离开了一份安稳的工作,加入一个风险较高的公司。父母当然很生气,过了一段时间,父母终于接受也认同她的决定。她今天的成就,就是当初做了这个让很多人失望的决定。另一位读者分享他当了兵后决定继续升学,很多人都说他傻,他会比同龄人慢了三年。当初这个决定也得不到别人的认同,但他觉得这是他要走的路,他自己独特的一条路。选择走自己的路,并不担保会达到社会主流所定义的成功,但你会成功的创造自己的人生。
有位读者这样总结了我们一天的分享学习:积极心态就是把“要我”转换成“我要”,对自己的人生负责任。 Perfect!
谢谢你们让我把涟漪效应扩散到青岛去。你们是我的悦日人。请继续做我的悦日人,在这里留言,分享你的想法及收获,让我们大家一起学习。
Cultivating Curiosity: A Personal Experiment
My article for Positive Psychology News Daily on November 23, 2008.
I found this quote on a billboard in the City Hall Square in Copenhagen while on holiday there last month: Replace fear of the unknown with curiosity. Recognizing moments of fear or anxiety is simple enough but entering a state of curiosity is a real challenge for me, probably has something to do with my practical sensibility.
Recent research by Beerman and colleagues published in the Journal of Positive Psychology suggests that curiosity is one of five strengths closely related to life satisfaction (the other four are gratitude, optimism, zest and the ability to love and be loved). Although it ranked pretty high on my VIA profile (no. 8 on the Values-in-Action Strengths-Inventory), I don’t feel ownership with curiosity like I do with my top 5 strengths yet. So how might one go about developing this strength?
Christopher Peterson, the developer of the VIA method, suggests cultivating our strengths by first identifying and using them in new ways. Curiosity is defined in the VIA as:
Curiosity [interest, novelty-seeking, openness to experience]:
“Taking an interest in ongoing experience for its own sake; finding subjects and topics fascinating; exploring and discovering.”
My A-ha Moment about Curiosity
I considered identifying fear- or anxiety-driven situations: that seemed like a good starting point. But then I had an a-ha moment in a most unexpected occasion. It was over a dinner with my workshop participants talking about customer profiling in luxury cosmetics marketing. Based on my buying behavior, I am definitely not an early adopter. Early adopters like to explore and discover new things and experiences. I am exactly the opposite. The launch of a new product cannot lure me to the cosmetics counter. I don’t get tempted to try a new brand of my favorite food in the supermarket. I like to order the same food on the menu in restaurants.
The a-ha moment for me was that I do possess a high level of curiosity but only in specific domains. I am not curious about material things but am highly curious when people are concerned. I want to know other people’s stories and what makes a person tick. I love to travel to different countries and experience the locals’ lifestyles. I love googling and checking out new websites to explore what is cool and interesting out there.
Specific Curiosity Exercises
This insight enables me to experiment with a more nuanced approach to incorporate more curiosity in my life especially in the here-and-now moments. Here are some positive psychology exercises I tried:
- Starting now, to always order a dish I’ve never tried before in restaurants.
- Pick a knowledge field I don’t normally go for. For example, my favorite website www.ted.com offers topics in many themes. Apart from my favorite themes, what makes us happy and how does the mind work, I make it a point to check out videos on themes I am least drawn to.
- Break my routine by varying the route to work or by sitting in a different wagon on the train.
- Try a new brand of food or toiletries when grocery shopping.
- Listen to different genres of music or to unfamiliar musicians.
- Hang around people who are high in curiosity and allow them to lead me into new experiences!
Once I intentionally suspended my preoccupation with being practical and resisted the tendency to ruminate on negative events, it became easier to treat the unknown as an adventure, which often leads to amazing encounters. Curiosity is still not a signature strength for me and it may never be, but the practice of cultivating curiosity has certainly exposed me to the richness of life, higher peaks and deeper valleys. Even when the outcome isn’t good, I will have wonderful experiences to add to my memory bank, and a good story to tell my friends!
Survey: Happier at work

Updated on 2008/11/20: This survey is still open. Please take 5 -10 minutes to complete this survey and contribute to my research on what people around the world do to make them happier at work. Thank you.
As part of the research for my second book, I posed this question “What is the one thing you do to make you happier at work?” to three friends (an investment banker, a headhunter and a human resources director) at a dinner party last week.
The answers they gave and the enthusiasm they showed for this question piqued my curiosity so I decided to pose this question to a wider audience.
I’m in two minds about letting you know what these three persons told me. I know you’ll be curious yet I don’t want their responses to influence your own response. Anyway, here are their responses:
- Friend A developed an awareness of his own fear and how it manifests in his behaviours. He learned to deal with his own fear and learned to behave constructively to lessen the fear in people who work with him.
- Friend B let go of her fear (losing her job by not being good enough or not being on the boss’s good book etc). She did this by formulating a realistic strategy to “What is the worst that could happen to me if I lose my job?”
- Friend C mentioned that she cannot change many of the stressful and negative events at work but by focusing on the well-being and growth of her team members, the reward of watching other people grow more than compensate for the negativity around her.
I’m inviting you to share your experience and co-create this book with me. I want to know what people actually do rather than what they believe or think they should do. I will share all your tried and tested interventions in my book without revealing the identities of the contributors.
There are only 3 questions in this survey and it will take no more than 5 minutes of your time. So please be my daymaker: make my day by completing this survey!
As a gesture of appreciation for completing this survey, I will send you a gift, RippleThanks, a set of thank-you cards that you can use to make other people happy at work, by catching them doing the right things.
我的英雄:龙应台
龙应台是我大学时就非常敬佩的一位作家。今年初很幸运的经过友人认识她,在台北及香港几次的互动后,让我不只欣赏她的才华,更钦佩的是她的人格特质及有所为,有所不为的勇气。
上个星期(10月18日)参加龙应台在香港大学的一个演讲。她首次剖白她的写作启蒙心路,她如何游走于英文和汉语,白话与文言之间。以一个历史的高度来探索,在台湾戒严期压抑的环境中成长的知识分子,如何取得文学养分,走过文学启蒙。
内容当然非常精彩, 但我要分享的不是演讲的内容,而是她做了一件事请,让我非常感动。
我很早就上网报名,所以顺利进场。 讲堂里坐得满满的,没有一个空位子,台阶上也坐满了人。节目开始时,外面还有许多没有预先报名的人等着想进来。当龙应台演讲时,她并没马上开始,反而是组织大家,请坐在台阶的人往前移,还把讲台让出来,让许多人坐到讲台上,这样就空出位子让在外面等待的每一个人都可以进来。她不愿意让有心来听她演讲的人失望而归。
我对她此举感到非常感动,因为她没必要这么做,却选择这么做,体现了她对人的尊重。
细节小事上,最能够看到一个人的人格与修养。
优势:有它为什么不用呢?
在中国的职场中,优点(Strengths)有被充分地诠释吗?当我最近在上海主持正面领导力研讨会时,曾经遇到过对“优势运用”(strengths-approach)的挑战。
“这评估根本不能告诉我自己的弱点,它只提出了我的长处。如果我不知道自己的弱点,我又怎么能够改善呢?那评估又有什么作用呢?”陈先生(化名)在后排叫嚷起来。陈先生和他的同事们都受过良好教育,在一家北欧船务公司任职高级经理。他们都曾于两个月前在上海参加过我主持的正面领导能力研讨会。同样地,他们都对那份没有提供弱点分析的VIA报告感到懊恼。
陈先生的头五项长处是:公正(fairness)、真实(authenticity)、仁慈(kindness)、爱心(love)和谦逊(humility)。他感到有点不明所以,因为报告中他的优点和现实的他有点差距。大家都认为他是一个急性子,容易与客人有争拗的人,他亦明白到自己最大的缺点是不能控制好自己的脾气。
VIA性格评估最重要的贡献并不是长处评估,而是后期的整合和改善过程。经过评估后,一个好的分析能令参与者完全了解自己的优势和怎样更好地运用它们。Marcus Buckingham的著作Go Put Your Strengths To Work 提供了很好的可以实际运用优势 的方法。 Kathryn Britton的文章Using Strengths When You Work 对该书作了 一个很好的摘要,大家可以浏览一下。我采用了以下的问题来引导陈先生:
Ming Tan:你有多认同这些优势呢(公正、真实、仁慈、爱心和谦逊)?
陈先生:公正、真实和谦逊肯定有,但我不认为自己十分友善,至于有爱心 就更不可能了。
Ming:很有趣呢。那份评估的结论来自你的答案。让我们探讨一下吧:在什么情况下你会表现出仁慈和关怀?你会对谁表现你的友善?我们在生活中会扮演不同的角色,我们也会因此而有不同的表现。可能你在饰演某些角色时会展现较多的善意?
陈先生:是的。我对太太和女儿都很好,对朋友也十分友善;但在工作中却不是这样。我又怎能在工作中友善呢?我们需要努力争取生意。 当客人变得不可理喻时,我不会像一些被动的同事,我会反击。
Ming:从这故事中,我看到你性格里头的公正和真实了。当你感到不公平时,你就可能会和其它人有争拗了。那当你友善时你是怎样的?
陈先生:我可以容忍,体谅别人,亦乐意聆听。就像与女儿相处的时候,我会变得有耐心,愿意倾听和容让。
Ming:好!那我们试试下一步吧。拿你较易和客人争论为例吧,你能够怎样运用你的五项优势于其中呢?
陈先生:公正会确保我可以平衡客户和公司的需要。是的,我明白了。与其和客户争论而破坏双方关系,我可以利用我的友善和同理心:我可以有耐心地聆听客户的需要,即使他们不对,我也可以表现得较谦虚。若是在以前,当我感到不公正或不合理的时候,我会立刻发作。
Ming:好像你已经找到方法在日常生活中运用你的优势了。下次请你告诉我在工作中这方法行不行吧。
陈先生三天后寄了一封电邮给我。他几乎又和客户争论起来,但在发作之前,他刚好记起要运用自己的仁慈和同理心。因为他能够聆听客户的需要,明白他们的看法从而很快地解决了矛盾。他后来收到了那客户寄来的一个大大的“多谢”。
陈先生很早便知道自己的脾气问题,但传统的“缺点导向作法”(deficit-approach)却只能使他的烦恼恶化。他尝试了许多改善办法:学习忍耐,学习从他人的角度出发考虑,压抑脾气,运用放松的技巧,但都是徒劳无功。终于,他利用自己的优点,付出最少的努力便成功了。
根据Clifton and Harter(2003),人们可以在“可改变的东西”(changeables)上作出改变,但最有效的方法却是适当运用自己的特性。在陈先生的例子中,他的进展与Clifton和Harter的“优势运用”(strengths approach)相互呼应:了解自己的优点,融入自我评价之中,并改变行为。
小小补充:我昨天遇上了陈先生。运用自我优势帮助他改善和客户的关系。陈先生和他的客人现在是站在同一方,而不是从前的对立面。这使得他的工作变得更有趣和有意思。我问他能否分享一下他对“优势运用”的心得,他说:“既然拥有这些优势,为什么不用它呢!”
参考书目:
Buckingham, M. (2007). Go put your strengths to work. New York: Free Press. ISBN 0-7432-6167-4
Clifton, D.O., & Harter, J.K. (2003). Investing in Strengths. In A. K.S. Cameron, B. J.E. Dutton, & C. R.E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 111-121). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Strengths: Might as well use them if you’ve got them

My first article for Positive Psychology News Daily
Do strengths translate well to workplaces in China? I run positive leadership workshops in Shanghai and Hong Kong, and recently came across an experience in which the strengths-approach was challenged.
“This assessment doesn’t tell me my weaknesses, it only contains strengths. I don’t get it! What’s the point of an assessment that doesn’t tell you your weaknesses? How can I improve if I don’t know my weaknesses?” Chen shouted from the back of the room. Chen (changed from his real name) and his colleagues, all highly educated senior managers of a Scandinavian shipping firm, attended my positive leadership workshop in Shanghai two months ago. His colleagues were just as puzzled by the absence of weaknesses in their VIA report.
Chen’s top five strengths are: Fairness, Authenticity, Kindness, Love, and Humility. He is confused. There is a dissonance between his reported strengths and his real-life persona. He is known to have a quick temper and regularly fights with his customers. He knows his biggest weakness is the inability to control his temper.
In coaching, the power of the VIA character strengths is not in the identification of strengths but in the integration and the shift that come afterwards. Often a good debrief is required before the individuals can fully make sense of what to do with his or her strengths. Marcus Buckingham’s Go Put Your Strengths To Work is a great resource on applying strengths at the practical level. You can read a great summary of this book at Using Strengths When You Work by Kathryn Britton. I used the following questions to debrief Chen.
Ming Tan: How much do you own these strengths (Fairness, Authenticity, Kindness, Love, and Humility)?
Chen: Definitely fairness, authenticity and humility. But I don’t think I am kind, especially not loving.
Ming: This is interesting. The survey results come from your answers. Let’s explore this a bit. In what situations do you display kindness and care? To whom might you show your kindness? We play different roles in life, and we can behave differently in different roles. Perhaps you show more kindness in one role and less in another role?
Chen: That’s true. I am kind to my wife and my daughter. I am also like this with my friends. But I am not kind at work. How can I be kind and caring at work? We need to fight for our business. When my client is being unreasonable, unlike my colleagues who are passive, I will fight back.
Ming: I can see the strength of fairness and authenticity coming into the picture now. When you sense something is unfair, that is where you might get into arguments with other people. Let’s try this. How do you behave when you are being kind?
Chen: I’m tolerant, willing to listen to other people, considerate, just like when I am with my daughter. I am patient, willing to listen to her, a lot of give and take.
Ming: Great. So let’s take another step. Take the case of your tendency to argue with your client. If you were to tap into your top five strengths, how could these strengths be applied in such a situation?
Chen: Fairness will ensure that I can always balance the needs of my client and our company position. Yes, I see it now. Instead of getting into arguments which damage the relationship, I can apply my kindness and empathy here. I can be more patient and be willing to listen to my clients. Even if they were wrong, I can show some humility too. In the past, when I sense injustice or unreasonableness, I immediately blow up.
Ming: Seems like you’re found a way to tap into your strengths to deal with a real life situation. Let me know how it works out for you when you are back at work.
Chen emailed me three days later. He had almost started an argument with a client. He remembered to apply his kindness and empathy just before he lost his cool. Because he was able to switch to listening and appreciating his client’s perspective, the issue was resolved quickly. He received a big “thank you” from the client afterwards.
Chen had been aware of his temper problem, but the traditional deficit-approach had only exacerbated his frustration. He had tried many ways to no avail: learn to be patient, learn to see things from other people’s perspective, suppress his temper, use calming techniques etc. He finally succeeded by tapping into his strengths, and did so with minimal effort or exertion of self-control.
According to Clifton and Harter (2003), people can change on the changeables but most efficiently through who they are to begin with. In Chen’s case, his development echoes the strengths approach described by Clifton and Harter: identification of talent, integration into one’s view of self, and changed behavior.
As a footnote, I caught up with Chen yesterday. His integration of strengths has helped him turn his former business contacts into friendly relationships. His clients and he are on the same team – not on opposite teams – making his work more fun and meaningful. I asked him to share his insights on strengths approach and he said, “Might as well use them if you’ve got them!”
References:
Buckingham, M. (2007). Go put your strengths to work. New York: Free Press. ISBN 0-7432-6167-4
Clifton, D.O., & Harter, J.K. (2003). Investing in Strengths. In A. K.S. Cameron, B. J.E. Dutton, & C. R.E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 111-121). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.